Tools: Canva, AI, Word Cloud
Time: 1-2 Weeks
Client: Children's Home Network (CSS Pinellas)
Collaborators: Management, Support Services Team
Employees are unintentionally allowing cultural assumptions to influence communication, decision-making, and teamwork, resulting in misunderstandings, reduced collaboration, and inequitable interactions.
Limited awareness of personal cultural lenses and implicit biases.
Insufficient practice in recognizing and interrupting bias in real workplace scenarios.
Lack of consistent behavioral expectations and tools for inclusive interactions.
All employees, especially those in cross-functional or customer-facing roles, who regularly interact with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Identify cultural assumptions in real time.
Pause and question interpretations before acting.
Apply inclusive communication strategies (e.g., clarifying questions, perspective-taking).
Demonstrate equitable decision-making in team and client interactions.
80% of learners correctly identify bias cues in scenario assessments.
Increase in self-reported confidence using bias-interrupting strategies (baseline → post-learning).
Reduction in reported cross-cultural misunderstandings within 90 days.
Managers observe improved collaboration behaviors in team check-ins.
A 5–7 minute microlearning module blending:
Brief explainer on cultural bias and its workplace impact.
Three interactive scenarios showing subtle cultural bias cues.
Learners choose actions, receive immediate feedback, and see alternative outcomes.
Bias-interruption toolkit (Pause–Check–Clarify model).
Optional reflection prompt to apply learning to a current work relationship.
Learning Objectives:
Identify examples of cultural bias in short workplace scenarios with at least 80% accuracy. (Remember/Understand)
Explain how personal cultural lenses can influence communication and decision-making during group discussion. (Understand)
Analyze a scenario to pinpoint where assumptions influenced behavior and propose an alternative, inclusive response. (Analyze)
Apply the Pause–Check–Clarify strategy to interrupt cultural bias in a guided role-play or facilitator-led activity. (Apply)
Demonstrate an inclusive communication technique (e.g., clarifying question, perspective-taking statement) during a brief partner activity. (Apply/Evaluate)
Attendance: 92% of registered learners attended the 20-minute microlearning session.
Engagement: Learners remained highly active during the discussion; 85% digitally responded to the word cloud scenario.
Facilitator Observation: Participants were quick to identify when assumptions appeared in the scenario and contributed real-world examples in their lives.
Objective 1 – Identify cultural bias cues
92% of learners correctly identified the subtle bias trigger in the scenario during the live poll.
Objective 2 – Explain how cultural lenses affect interpretation
Learners articulated at least one personal bias assumption during the debrief; the facilitator noted increased self-awareness.
Objective 3 – Analyze and choose inclusive responses
90% selected the “Pause → Check → Clarify” option in the commitment statement to try.
Objective 4 – Apply the model in discussion or role-play
76% demonstrated the model during the pair activity; the remaining participants required light facilitator prompting.
Participants paused before responding during the role-play, showing real-time internalization of the framework.
Learners used language such as “Let me clarify…” and “I may be interpreting this through my own lens,” indicating uptake of inclusive communication habits.
Teams reported back that they identified moments earlier in their day where the model would have reduced misunderstanding.
Common comments included:
“I didn’t realize how fast my assumptions kick in.”
“The scenario felt very real—this happens all the time.”
“The tips you provided are easy to use.”
“I really enjoyed this training."
Self-reported confidence using bias-interrupt strategies: Increased from 48% pre-session to 86% post-session.
Clarity on what cultural bias looks like in day-to-day interactions: 91% rated “clear” or “very clear.”
Commitment to applying the model today: 96% selected “Yes.”
Provide a monthly micro-scenario via employee newsletter to reinforce the model.
Encourage managers to open team meetings with a quick “Pause → Check → Clarify” moment or reflection question.